data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/7f64e/7f64e307cf587da570a5f07f8e4b974a8eda342c" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3c2f4/3c2f45c825f5d109ddf6aebe8efa91d1736c3030" alt=""
Pamela Anderson's recent PETA ad has been deemed too racy for Montreal -- but it's really just a new take on an old idea.
I made this connection while ordering my text books for my gender and international relations class.
The cover of Carol J. Adams' book "The Sexual Politics of Meat: A Feminist-Vegetarian Critical Theory" features the "Cattle Queen," a nude woman with her body marked for various cuts of "meat."
So what's the big deal? Pam's wearing a bikini.
Here's the big pictures the critics are missing --
Is there a connection between the objectification of animals and the objectification of women? YES.
And this ad makes that point clear.
Women are sometimes referred to as a "piece of meat" or their treatment is referred to as "like a piece of meat."
Perhaps this ad is unknowingly feminist by refocusing on the sexual politics of meat consumption.
But only those of us looking through a very sharp feminist lens would know it.
Read Adams' book -- I am.
No comments:
Post a Comment